SCOTT SCHEETZ PHOTOGRAPHY
  • Home
  • Galleries
    • Automotive Photography
    • Portraits & Headshots >
      • Katie - '70s Inspired Shoot
      • Anthony Duong
      • Ayanna McHerron
      • Donte Ford
      • Poovey Family
      • Corrie Hermans
      • Stacie & Aden
      • Jaime Carini
      • Chere Ko
      • Chris Poovey
      • Anchorage Chamber Music Festival
      • Amy, Sarah, Anja, & Laruen
      • Jonathan Rudy
      • Julia
      • Elizabeth
      • Lara
      • Sarah Laurence
      • Misc. People and Headshots
    • Classical Concerts >
      • Dallas AGO Meyerson Concert
      • Reformation Hymn Festival
      • IU Summer Orchestra 2015
      • IU Summer Opera 2015
      • Ballet at the Buskirk Chumley 2015
      • Singing Hoosiers Spring Concert 2015
      • Ballet at the Buskirk Chumley Theater 2014
      • Misc. Concerts
    • Live Music >
      • HPUMC @ HOB
      • HPUMC Dessert Theater 2019
      • DCMB Back Door
      • Snarky Puppy at the BlueBird - September 16, 2014
      • DCMB at People's Park - August 19, 2014
      • Culture Shock 2014
      • Misc. Live Music
    • Couples >
      • Anthony & Chris
      • Kevin & Megan
      • John & Sarah
      • Priscilla & Henry
      • Jonathan & Katie
    • Street Photography
    • Event Photography >
      • HPUMC Oudoor Christmas Party 2020
      • PCA Founder's Day 2020
      • COLCrusaderQuest
      • UMC General Conference
      • Sacred Music Conference - Sep. 27-29, 2015
      • Jubilate 2015
      • 2015 Aiken Trials
      • Delta Gamma Formal Dance
      • Delta Gamma Rush Event
      • 2014 Fall Psychology Conference IU
      • Camp Bethel Family Camp 2014
      • Unidiversity 2014
      • Camp Bethel 75th Anniversary July 2014
      • Unidiversity 2013
    • Wedding Photography >
      • Rebecca & Jeff - Jan 21, 2017
      • Claire & Jon - Oct 14, 2016
      • John & Sarah - July 24, 2015
      • Katie and Jonathan's Wedding - June 20, 2015
      • Dan & Suzanne's Wedding - August 9, 2014
    • Film
  • About
    • About
    • Equipment
  • Contact
  • Blog

Canon 5D Review

8/13/2016

22 Comments

 
With the new Canon 5D Mark IV just around the corner, I figured it would be a perfect time to look at the very first 5D. Throughout this review I'll be comparing certain aspects of the 5D Mark I to the Canon 5D Mark II (2008), Mark III (2012), the 1DS Mark II (2004), and the 60D (2010).
Picture
The original Canon 5D was announced in August of 2005, and was revolutionary for its time. It was the first full-frame camera in a standard body size. The Canon BG-E4 was the optional battery grip to enable the secondary grip. The only full-frame option before that was the Canon 1Ds line, the Kodak DCS-14, and the Contax N-digital which were all larger double grip cameras aimed at the professional market. In addition, the 5D was the first full-frame camera to enter the market at under $3,500 USD. The Canon 1DSII was nearly double the price and the Kodak DCS-14 and Contax N-digital were beginning to be forgotten about due to their older technology.
Picture
It's a very boxy camera, especially with the optional battery grip in place.
Spec. wise, the 5D seems like a fairly modest camera. Coming in at only 12.8 megapixels, 9 auto focus points, 3 fps continuous shooting, and a limited ISO range of 50-3200, one might not even think about considering it now. One can forget about live view, movie mode, and self-cleaning sensors. Those would not be introduced until the 5D Mark II in 2008.
All the negative aspects aside, I'm here to tell you why this is still a great camera.
There are several aspects that make the 5D a charmingly wonderful little camera. From it's bare-bones simplicity to fantastic image quality, it's still a joy to shoot today.
Picture
Canon 5D, Canon EF 28mm f/1.8 USM, ISO 200.
The image quality is fantastic. 12.8 megapixels may not seem like much, but the images are sharp. For portrait work, the low megapixel count may seem like a downside, but it really encourages one to get the composition correct in camera and keep cropping to a minimum. When paired with nice primes or zoom lenses, the resulting detail is stunning from low megapixel count. The low pixel count means large pixels, which results in good ISO performance and dynamic range.
Picture
Canon 5D, Canon EF 85mm f/1.8 USM, ISO 100. Unedited RAW preview.
Picture
Canon 5D, Canon EF 85mm f/1.8 USM, ISO 100. Pushed in Lightroom. Excellent detail and colors for such an aggressive edit.
Picture
Canon 5D, Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS USM, ISO 100. More shooting into the sun. Excellent tones from this camera.
While it does have a limited ISO range, the higher ISOs are very good. ISO 1600 is clean, and 3200 begins to show some noise. If you shoot RAW, things get fun. In my experience, you can push a RAW file 1 or 2 stops and still get usable results. This allows for ISO 6400 and 12800 on a 2005 camera. It's pretty incredible. Noise performance at those pushed ISO settings are similar to the 5D Mark II, with the Mark II having a slight edge in my opinion. Comparing it 1DS Mark II, the full-frame pro camera at the time, the ISO performance is slightly better on the 5D.
Picture
Canon 5D, Sigma 120-300 f/2.8 OS + 1.4x, ISO 3200. Pushed 1.3 stops to ISO 8000 in Lightroom. Very usable after a little bit of noise reduction.
Picture
Canon 5D, Canon EF 24mm f/1.4L USM II, ISO 3200. Pushed 2 stops to 12800 in Lightroom. This is what I would consider the upper limit. Terrible lighting, but it resulted in something usable for web or smaller prints.
Picture
Canon 5D, Canon 50mm f1.4 USM, ISO 3200. Pushed 3.3 stops in Lightroom to ISO 32000. Not usable for most situations, but a fun experiment.
The dynamic range from the sensor is pretty good. It exhibits a little bit of the banding issues that have plagued Canon sensors for almost a decade when you really push the shadows. Dynamic range is on par with the 5D Mark II, and a little bit worse than the 5D Mark III. At the time, it had the best dynamic range out of all the Canon cameras. It is better than the 1DS Mark II, which exhibits more noise in the shadow regions. The 5D's small form factor and pretty good dynamic range makes it a great light-weight landscape camera.
Picture
Canon 5D, Canon EF 24mm f/1.4L USM II, ISO 100. Unedited RAW file preview.
Picture
Canon 5D, Canon EF 24mm f/1.4L USM II, A significant shadow push and highlight pull in lightroom as well as an overall exposure push. Quite good for 2005 technology with some slight banding in only the darkest regions.
Another dynamic range example in-front of the New York City Library in Bryant Park.
Picture
Canon 5D, Tokina 11-16mm f/2.8, ISO 100. Unedited RAW preview.
Picture
Canon 5D, Tokina 11-16mm f/2.8, ISO 100. A significant shadow push and highlight pull in lightroom as well as an overall exposure push. Some false colors are appearing in the areas pushed the most, but overall quite good.
For portrait work, the camera is excellent. Beautiful color rendition and skin tones. The size and weight make it easy to shoot with for long periods of time and less intimidating than a full-body 1D series camera.
Picture
Canon 5D, Canon EF 85mm f/1.2L USM II, ISO 100. Very sharp and great AF accuracy even shooting wide open with the 85L.
There is something very special about the image quality of this camera. It has a certain look that keeps bringing photographers back to it. The older sensor paired with the DigicII processor results in some very organic looking photos with smooth tones. Some have described it as almost film like. There are 2 other cameras which achieve similar results. The Canon 1DS Mark II, and Canon 1D Mark II, both of which feature the same processor and very similar sensor technology. The 5D being slightly newer performs ever so slightly better in regards to sensor performance, but both of the 1D series bodies are better built with better AF and drive performance. It's nice that there are a couple of options, and the price on all 3 of those cameras have dropped drastically in the past several years.
Picture
Canon 5D, Canon EF 24mm f/1.4L USM II, ISO 400. That beautiful extra bit of subject isolation made possible by shallower depth of field available on full-frame cameras.
AF performance is not amazing, but it is still very good and a very capable camera. The camera features a 9-point AF system (the same one found in the later 5D Mark II), 1 cross-type in the center, and 6 assist points which are not user selectable. The assist points only function in AI-Servo mode, which is when they are most useful. An obvious direct comparison is the AF system in the 40D, 50D, and 60D, which featured a 9-point, all cross-type system. In my experience against the 60D, the 5D feels much more responsive and accurate in AI-Servo thanks to the 6 assist points which the 60D lacks. In real world use, the difference between cross-type and standard on the outer points was not that big of a difference.
Picture
Canon 5D, Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS USM, ISO 125. Shooting sports with no issues.
Comparing to the more advanced 45-point system found in the 1DS Mark II, the simple 9-point system on paper seems like nothing. However, the center cross-type point on the 5D seems more responsive in lower light than the 1DS Mark II. Perhaps this is due to being released one year after the 1DS II and having slightly newer technology. In every other way, the 1DS II's AF system is better. Better coverage, more points, better tracking and customization, as expected from a flagship camera.
Picture
Canon 5D, Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS, ISO 100. Aiken Trials. Tracking the running horses with no problems.
Picture
Canon 5D, Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS USM, ISO 1250. Tracking soccer just fine.
Picture
Canon 5D, Tamron 300mm f/2.8 LD-IF, ISO 800. Using the AF confirmation on a chipped manual focus lens. No issues, and 3fps continuous gave me enough frames to choose the right one for the perfect shot.
Continuous shooting is low at 3 frames a second, but for most shooting it is adequate, if not more than enough. The buffer holds about 17 frames before filling. I've shot sports with this camera on several occasions including basketball, horse racing, water sports, soccer, ultimate frisbee, and various other sports and wildlife. While something like the 5D Mark III or the 1DS II are more suited for sports, It's more than adequate enough as well as being great for events, weddings, and use in the studio.
Picture
Canon 5D, Canon EF 24mm f/1.4L II, ISO 1600. Pushed 1.3 stops to ISO 4000. The AF system had no problems tracking the fast dancing in low light with the distractions of smoke and flashing strobes. Utilizing the 600EX-RT and it's wonderful radio capabilities.
It's max flash sync is 1/200th of a second, which is fine for studio work. For outdoors it's more of an issue, but that's why high speed sync exists. I'm also happy to report that it works fine with even the newest of the Canon flashes including the 600EX-RTs.
Picture
Canon 5D, Canon EF 24-70mm f/2.8L, ISO 100. Shooting in the studio using the wireless capability of the 600EX-RT with no problems!
The Canon 5D features a 230,000 pixel 2.5" screen, which was huge for its time period. Originally the first batch had a different screen which had a slight green tint to it. The later batches use a different display and do not have the green tint issue. To avoid this issue, look for a camera with a serial number that begins with a 2 or 3. If it begins with a 1, it will be from the first batch.
Picture
The tiny screen by modern standards. It's still quite usable, but looks very sad compared to the 5D Mark III.
Physically, the camera is relatively small when compared to a 1D series body. It's a wonderful camera for street photography or travel due to it's simplicity. It just takes photos and that's it. There aren't a lot of menus to go through, and since the display isn't that great, you can focus on the moment instead of flipping through photos on the camera.
Picture
Canon 5D, Canon EF 50mm f/1.8, ISO 160. Some street photography around the Indiana University Campus. The 5D paired with a fast 50 makes for a great light-weight combo.
Picture
Canon 5D, Canon EF 24-70mm f/2.8L, ISO 3200. Pushed 1 stop to 6400 with no noise reduction. Shooting in wet conditions and fast moving action. No issues regarding water or auto focus.
Build quality of the 5D is excellent. It features a rugged all metal body and chassis. Although it is not marketed as being weather sealed, I've shot in light to moderate rain with no issues. Ergonomics leave a bit to be desired for most people. The grip is large and too short, resulting in your pinky finger slipping under the camera and supporting a decent amount of weight. The battery grip (Canon BG-E4) significantly improves the ergonomics and fixes the issue by extending the grip so one's pinky does not slip under the camera body. Comparing the original 5D to the 5D III, it appears as if someone took a brick and made it look somewhat like a camera. It lacks the beautiful rounded edges on the body and pentaprism that the Mark III has. 
Picture
5DIII, 5D, BG-E4 battery grip. The mark III is more rounded, but the original seems just slightly smaller.
Button and dial layout is good. It matches the standard layout, and feels very natural for anyone who is used to shooting Canon. It retains the earlier dual function power and dial lock switch underneath the back dial. Some people complain that the switch moves when the camera is at one's side and not in use, which is why Canon later moved the switch to under the mode dial. It's never been an issue for me, and if it was, the camera has almost no power on delay.
Looking at the price during August of 2016, the camera can be found between $300-500 USD, which is incredible for a full-frame DSLR. One word of caution is the dreaded mirror issue that plagued the 5D. There was an issue with the 5D where the mirror would fall off. Canon issued a recall, and most cameras have had the mirror reinforced. If you are buying the camera, just make sure it has had the mirror reinforcement job and you should be good to go!
So if you are looking for a simple and fun camera as a backup, travel, or even main camera, the 5D is a great option at it's very low price, but very capable specifications. It still has a spot in my bag as the back up to the 5D Mark III.
To view other photos from this camera and view photos in high resolution, head over to my Flickr page where I have the photos posted in full resolution, and check out the results for your self!

https://www.flickr.com/photos/scottscheetz/sets/72157631546374017
22 Comments
Phil
4/4/2017 12:13:31 pm

Loved this review. It shows the camera is still very good for its age and the photos are just brilliant.

I recently bought a 5D and love it.

Reply
Scott Scheetz
4/4/2017 04:27:23 pm

Thank you Phil! It really is a great camera for it's age, and thank you for you kind words on the photos.

Enjoy your new 5D!

Reply
Michael A Wong link
6/23/2017 10:56:19 am

Been shooting a 5D Classic for weddings, studio and scenics for 11 years. Must have 200 weddings by now, all of which I've used a freak sharp 28-135 IS lens. Always absolutely beautiful images especially outdoor. I've shot with D30, Rebel, 20d, 30d, 40d and currently have a 100D and T5i. I've ownd many small sensor zoom cameras, which are great fun. The 5D Classic still renders the finest photo file of all.

Reply
Bill Merritt
11/3/2017 04:27:34 pm

I purchased a used (serial number starts with "1") about 5 years ago. It is my first and only FF. I use it mostly with a Sigma 24-60/2.8 lens. I agree with everything you write about with the exception of higher ISO performance in low light. After seeing your shots, I am guessing may be 50% my fault. Any tips using this camera in low light (if any) would be appreciated. Noise seems to be getting worse as years go by. I asked a Canon tech rep if it was possible that age could affect sensor to produce more noise. He said although possible, he had never heard of this complaint and said it was highly unlikely. Hate to abandon it, but may have to. Great article and highly appreciated.

Reply
Scott Scheetz
11/6/2017 05:12:46 pm

Hello Bill,

The amount of noise present depends on how much you've sharpened in post processing, as well as if you apply any noise reduction. Typically with higher ISO shots at 3200, 6400, or the occasional 12800, I use edge masking when sharpening in lightroom. For example, my default setting for sharpening is 25, and I might then add a mask of 15-20 depending on the areas I want sharp, in addition to the 15-20 present on luminance noise reduction.

Some shots also have a second noise reduction pass in lightroom using a selective brush and creating a secondary noise reduction mask for out of focus elements where noise is more noticeable.

In addition, good light (not a lot, but good) is always better than bad light. You'll notice that in most of my high ISO examples, the subjects are relatively well lit, albeit not with a ton of light. The colors and noise performance is quite good on those shots. On the 2 high ISO examples in poor light to show the extreme (the dancing photo of the guy and girl taken at ISO 12800, and the photo below it of the girl taken at ISO 320000), you'll see that the noise performance is not as good, but more importantly the color performance and accuracy takes a hit. This is because the light isn't illuminating the entire color spectrum as it is bad light.

So in summary, creative and extensive noise reduction and sharpening with masks, as well as good (or decent) light to begin with, which doesn't mean a lot of light.

I hope this helps! Please let me know if you have any other questions or comments. Thanks for reading my blog!

Reply
Bill Merritt
11/6/2017 07:41:20 pm

Thank you Scott. Sadly, I have several images to practice on. Will apply your tips and see how it works. Appreciate the response.
Bill

Scott Scheetz
11/12/2017 05:42:21 pm

You're welcome Bill. Best of luck!

Bill Merritt
11/12/2017 07:49:18 pm

Thank you Scott. Have started al learning process using your tips and some LR tutorials. Really appreciate the response. Cheers!

Rimas
3/16/2018 07:52:10 pm

Hi!

Loved the article! Although I have a 5D Mark IV (and had a Mark III before that) I recently bought a couple of the original 5D cameras to have as "bangers", to just carry with me everywhere at all times. Dirt-cheap to buy and from everything I've seen so far - the image seems great! Can't wait for delivery, the wait is killing me :D
I still have my old 60D, but according to DXO (and my eyes) the 5D beats the crap out of the 60D in terms of image quality, which is quite exciting, considering that the 60D is also more expensive in the second hand market. I've looked at DPReview raw samples at various ISO levels and RV pushes - seems like the 5D classic is pretty much on-par with the Mark III too, which is insane (after all, the 5D3 had no advantage over the 5D2 in terms of image quality or noise and the same was the case between the 5D and 5D2).
Anyway,can't wait for the bodies to arrive. I'll slap a 50 f/1.4 on them and have some fun :)

Reply
Scott Scheetz
3/18/2018 07:09:43 pm

Rimas,

Thanks! I appreciate it. I've got the 5D Mark III as well. If you take resolution out of the equation, noise performance is pretty close between the 2. Obviously the Mark III does have a higher limit, but up to 6400, the original does spectacularly well. I'm always amazed at how well it handles for it's age. Any 50mm is great on a full-frame camera, as I'm sure you are aware. Enjoy your new toy! I'm sure you'll get some wonderful shots with it, and enjoy the process. It's delightfully simple, and you can really just focus on the environment and the process of the photography since it lacks all the modern bells and whistles.

Reply
Rimas
3/28/2018 06:37:39 pm

Hey!
So I received one of the two cameras I bought (still waiting for the other one to be released from customs) and the images come out great! The low resolution doesn't *really* bother me for online use and the images come out beautiful and sharp, even from a relatively fuzzy Canon 50mm f/1.4 (which is the worst of the 3 available) - not bad! There's a filmic look to the files out of the box too - I've not seen the Mark III or the Mark IV do that!
But I must say - the Mark IV is miles ahead in terms of image quality, especially noise levels and recovery, so I'll still keep using that for actual work and fine art. But for building a library of skies and textures for composites - the classic by my side will be unbeatable :)

Scott Scheetz
3/28/2018 09:52:35 pm

Rimas,

Glad to hear one of the cameras arrived and that the images look great! The old 5D does pair really well with the sort of lack-luster 50mm f/1.4 as it has that nice film look to it. I've heard that the Mark IV is definitely miles ahead of both the original and the Mark III, so that's no surprise. It really is fantastic for on the go work since it's so simple and light weight. Enjoy shooting!

Ashok
3/27/2018 05:17:32 am

Excellent sir..I have also 5D mark 1...after seeing your photographs my perception changed to it..

Reply
Scott Scheetz
3/27/2018 12:14:22 pm

Thanks! Hope you like the camera as much as I do!

Reply
Bill Merritt
3/28/2018 05:25:12 pm

Just want to add that a well known UK wedding photographer continues to use his 5D's for professional use. Richard Barley has some very interesting information why and how he uses them along with lenses and flashes. You may be surprised how low-tech his approach is. He is a wealth of information. You can find him on youtube.

Reply
Rimas
3/28/2018 06:31:18 pm

Richard also sells 5D's, but I wasn't very successful with his correspondence. He replied to my inquiry pretty fast, asked for 400 pounds + shipping (I bought a mint 5D from Japan for 300 and from Poland from 200) and never replied to my reply when I asked if the 5D had the mirror reinforced. Didn't leave a great impression to me, the guy :/

Reply
Scott Scheetz
3/28/2018 09:48:19 pm

Bill,

Very interesting. I'll look him up. It's always interesting to see other photographers using older/low-tech equipment and approach.

Reply
Reinier Visser
4/25/2018 01:50:43 pm

Hello,

I have bought this camera a week ago here in Amsterdam the Netherlands.

It is still a good camera I must say.

I like the color tone of the pictures very much.

This is my first,(nice priced ) full frame camera for 375 euro with a Canon 20/35 lens included.

And I think 12.8 MP is more than enough .

Reply
Scott Scheetz
4/25/2018 02:02:01 pm

Very nice! That's a great price. Glad to hear you are enjoying it!

Reply
Rafael Esquivel link
4/28/2019 02:05:54 am


Hello, I'm excited I'll say it like this: I sell to use several Nikon models from d80 to Nikon 7100 ... I never managed to match their direct color was something like yellow or orange just did not give me the colors I could smell, after that great crossing years, I decided to buy a Canon 60D take it as my friend, it was a battle camera and it was in Canon when I discovered that beautiful tonality, I used this camera for 4 years, for personal reasons I had to sell it something sad for me ... a couple of weeks ago a good friend of mine also dedicated to photography offered me this camera Canon 5d at the moment I took it in my hands I thought this machine has something special, I turned it and saw the screen I felt something in my stomach, well. .. my friend decide to lend me a couple of days I made a first session to my wife and I thought this is another world the color is so real something happens! I arrived at my house and I downloaded at LR. It was when I thought that this is what I was looking for for years. This is what I needed so much! Today I am happy with this super machine I have it with a 50mm 1.4 and a 24.105L that camera that jewel ...

Reply
Scott Scheetz
4/28/2019 10:24:07 pm

Glad to hear you are enjoying the 5D. It certainly is a magical camera. Super fun with a fast 50mm too.

Reply
MaryPena link
1/6/2021 04:48:32 pm

Nice poost thanks for sharing

Reply



Leave a Reply.

Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.